If people with widely divergent opinions agree on something, is that to be taken as more than mere concensus on one specific? Probably not … but what gives rise to such a constellation?

Anyhow, this breakdown of opinions on the issue of universal heath insurance brings this to a painful point: peek this typological breakdown … now, ponder this: if we could explicate the views of each of the groups who agree, wouldn’t that serve to clarify just what the “Enterprisers” are choking on?

(Supplemantary: how come fewer “Disadvantaged Democrats” support this than “Liberals”?)




Related posts (rating):