This post is at http://gnodal.livejournal.com/57614.html … but it can also be reached at http://tinyurl.com/s5pgc … is that a bad thing? Good?
There is no such space as gnodal.livejournal.com (which, BTW, can also be reached at livejournal.com/~gnodal/); that’s a handy representation that makes a long number human-readable. But what happens when things move?
In the early days of the web my work creating user docs got me a 1Meg account on our community free net. After years of inactivity a sysop decided to cut that back to 500K. So files that had for years sat in chebucto.ns.ca/~ab006/ had to move. Likewise the is.dal.ca/canid/ account I had used while at Dalhousie University (programming VRML for the ethology lab in the psych department): the box was decomissioned and everything had to move.
Even when things are done well enough to ensure that nothing gets lost (not the case here) whole sets of documents end up 404. The better and more popular the site, the more profound the ramifications.
Raising this issue with Alexander Johannesen (Know many folk who would blog “The epistemological implications of Topic Maps for librarians“?) he replied, in part, “one of the policies at the library is that all links are permanent, meaning we get to hold on to all sorts of redundant crap and can’t introduce new paradigms in tools and practices of our content.*sigh*”
I’m suspicious; when things are persistently wrong I get to feeling that we really don’t know what we’re doing.
We’ve had DNS a long time … why is it so hard to index entities?
May 29th, 2006 on 17:50
Note to self
I just blurted this in reply to Alex’s “ The epistemological implications of Topic Maps for librarians“:
January 22nd, 2007 on 00:40
Thanks a lot for what You are doing!
Hello, great site, I found a lot of useful information here, thanks a lot for Your work!
With the best regards!
David
January 22nd, 2007 on 02:31
Re: Thanks a lot for what You are doing!
How strange … someone makes a nice reply to something that’s almost a year old but leaves no contact data … not even a blog URL.
heh … and not 30 minutes ago I was thinking “After 11 years on the web I’m finding the internet just plain boring.”
January 22nd, 2007 on 03:30
Re: Thanks a lot for what You are doing!
Could be a spam-bot, as there might be links taken automatically out of the post. I’ve seen these in the past on numerous blogs, and people not knowing why people write these things. Some ponder if there are some key words in those replies together with some names and parts of content that together make up some indexing spam / scheme thing, although i’m not sure about it all.
January 22nd, 2007 on 04:53
Re: Thanks a lot for what You are doing!
huh huh … an anonymous reply to my response to an anonymous comment. 😉
Yes … that’s possible … the fact that it’s signed “David” caught my eye.
Aweful sophisticated for no apparent gain, though.
Hey, I just remembered some SPAM in my wiki that read like that. quite right!