In his 2003/01/14, Tantek Çelik rolls out his view on XHTML. (thanks to Jeffrey/for this one.)
Also, in his 2003/01/06/ Tantek points to”Simon Willison: … semantic XHTML provides a powerful and well defined format for storing content in a way that is both future proof and instantly accessible.
Archive for January 18th, 2003
Imported from MozDawg without title
Imported from MozDawg without title
Calling “Adaptive design for weblog software” “a great chewy chunk of stuff”, Matt Jones comments, “Welcome to the New Cambrian.”. Well, thanks, Matt!
“The spectrum of software development has two ends. On one end is the push model (yes, I’m going to lapse into the push/pull dichotomy again), which is the model where you set your sights on a goal, and build a tower to get there (like Windows). On the other end is the pull model, which is more like an ecology. Tiny steps, filling niches, each new piece of development just taking advantage of what’s already there, and creating new capabilities — like, life creates conditions conducive to life, in everything that it does . But it’s undirected, not goal oriented, and slow. It can’t be forced. “
Imported from MozDawg without title
Yaa yaa, nice pages that don’t use tables … shurr. No, don’t get me wrong, I’m headed there, but don’t expect me to say To Hell With Bad Browsers … I probably spend half my time using NS4.X, for a number of reasons (none having to do with pretty pages, of course). Any design domain that thinks of three columns as the “holy grail” has got some serious thinking to do. With a good bit of sloppiness, I got this page to display what I wanted: 2 columns, menu right, where the menu is not 100% height. Is that so much to ask? really!
must read: Box Lessons … there be dragons, indeed!
Imported from MozDawg without title
At c|net news, Paul Festa writes Dancing around Web services, which focuses on this little storm cloud:
“There’s this division of labor that’s emerging between those who can develop (Web) services and those that can put them together to make an application,” said Eric Newcomer, chief technology officer at Iona Technologies and a member of the W3C’s Web Services Architecture committee. “Choreography (is) about getting business analysts to put Web services together to build an application.”
But questions about the intentions of some high-profile W3C members–Microsoft, IBM and BEA Systems–threaten to derail the possibility of an industrywide standard, said analysts and other observers.”
Standards are bullshit. XHTML is a crock. The W3C is irrelevant. yaa yaa yaa …
Imported from MozDawg without title
Dan Bricklin and the SMBmeta project should be interested in this: SKICal – Structured Knowledge Initiative – Calendar
“The Structured Knowledge Initiative Calendar – SKICal – aims to improve the information infrastructure concerned with public events (concerts, sports competitions, conferences etc.)
SKICal is working towards this goal by promoting the new international standard specification for the exchange of calendar information which is known as iCalendar.
SKICal work is coordinated by Metamatrix in Stockholm, which has recieved sponsorship from NUTEK – Sweden`s central public authority for matters concerning the growth and renewal of industry.”
Imported from MozDawg without title
Anything new under the sun? This certainly isn’t the dustiest document I’ve found this evening, but still … it’s at least 6 years old … and it still rings sweet! From UMichDearborn, by Marcy Bauman: Networked Hypertext (reads in part) “This essay is an attempt to answer those questions. It is my central contention that the writing being done in new environments — on listservs, MUDs and MOOs, and the world wide web — is essentially a new form of hypertext …”
Topoi and Conceptualization
Whooo-boy! Yessir, nothing like reading old files to get a sense of how one has come to be the person one has come to be! If my old collection of HyperNews related items was not enough of a chocker *waves and shouts to Daniel LaLiberte; may he always drink deep and prosper*, I found another directory full of items relating to *what else?* topoi. What is this about? Well, let me tell you about my theory of how strange attractors play a role in the cognitive processes of conceptualization. !now. Okay, instead, let me share this with you … I had a local copy of this item, which is still alive on the web!
This Week’s Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 68) – October 29, 1995, by John Baez
Okay, now the time has come to speak of many things: of topoi, glueballs, communication between branches in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory, knots, and quantum gravity.
1) Robert Goldblatt, Topoi, the Categorial Analysis of Logic, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics vol. 98, North-Holland, New York, 1984.
If you’ve ever been interested in logic, you’ve got to read this book. Unless you learn a bit about topoi, you are really missing lots of the fun. The basic idea is simple and profound: abstract the basic concepts of set theory, so as to define the notion of a “topos”, a kind of universe like the world of classical logic and set theory, but far more general!”
Isn’t that wonderful?! I feel like I’ve discovered that my clansmen have not all died off! *blush*
Now, it’s just a matter of relating this back to BPML/N and SMBmetta.