{"id":548,"date":"2003-01-01T15:43:00","date_gmt":"2003-01-01T15:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gnodal.protension.com\/journal\/?p=319"},"modified":"2010-03-30T18:40:59","modified_gmt":"2010-03-31T01:40:59","slug":"319-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/gnodal.protension.com\/journal\/archives\/548","title":{"rendered":"BufferDump DEC2002"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\nMoved all of the below<\/blink> from original site as one big slab of really ugly HTML (I’d never write gack like this by hand)
\nYaaaa I know blink sux … it’s just for the day … 1JAN03<\/i><\/p>\n

Topic Map links<\/a> collected by Lars Marius Garshol<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Friday, December 13, 2002:<\/h4>\n

<\/b><\/p>\n

\nDang!!<\/i><\/b> … blogger.com lost its templates at some time, so all of this site’s customization is now *pffffft* history. Well, dang<\/i>!!<\/p>\n

\n

\n*Thud!!* … according to Martin Fowler’s essay on technical documents<\/a>, that’s the sound of doom … and I agree, totally.
\nIf I want to find out Bluebeard’s age at the time of his execution, I \/don’t\/ want to haul an encyclopedia off the shelf, and there’s no reason I should have to. But “communication” is too often measured by the gross presence of \/wey too much\/ … and I don’t think things are better just because the pages are virtual rather than pulp and ink.
\nYou know, we’re very very good at doing what we do, when we know what we’re doing. And when we’re not doing well, I suspect it’s because we don’t know what we’re on about.<\/p>\n

\nSomething I picked up just today:<\/p>\n

“Stacking a thousand doghouses one atop the other to build a skyscraper is a great proposition for doghouse vendors, but not for future occupants. Skyscrapers need an architecture of their own – their own paradigm”
\nHoward Smith and Peter Fingar; Business Process Management: The Third Wave<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\nBernard \/\/ 18:54<\/a><\/small>
\n<\/p>\n

\n\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Sunday, November 17, 2002:<\/h4>\n

<\/b><\/p>\n

\n<\/p>\n